Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Catastrophe was a very hard play to understand. I think that part of what made it difficult was the fact that it was so short. We have been trained by Hollywood to think that we should know all the details of a plot line by the time the story is finished. We are used to being presented with a problem and then in some way the problem is resolved by the end. In Catastrophe, we see that the problem is how to do the finishing scene in a play. D directs A on how to change the appearance of P to achieve his desired affect. In the end D is happy with the result and the “problem” such as it were, is solved. However this story is much different than the ones that we are used to. The problem stands alone. The audience has no clue about the context in which this problem exists, which is something that causes frustration to audiences who now expect to know the whole story.

3 Comments:

At 9:38 AM, Blogger Rebecca said...

I agree with your statement that audiences get frustrated at lack of information. I think that maybe if this play were performed in a final production form rather than a staged reading that it would be easier to understand the missing information. One group talked about having guards with guns on stage to show why the protagonist was stuck on the stage. These kinds of physical elements such as lighting, scenery, props, and costume might help fill in the gaps that the words leave behind.

 
At 11:02 AM, Blogger Dan said...

I do think that having the play in final form would make it easier to understand. But I do not know that it would fill in enough of the gaps to keep me from being frustrated. For example, having guards on stage would explain why P was forced to submit to the D's will without protest. But that would also raise further questions. The the audience would want to know who the guards were and what P had done to warrant being guarded. To me the play is just to abstract to be understood well.

 
At 2:30 PM, Blogger Brad said...

How could the length of the play make it hard to understand? I don't really see how a short play could be hard to understand. I definitely see how it's suprising that it's so short, but that doesn't necessarily make the content difficult to u comprehend.
I agree that the content does lack a background as to what is going on and the setting of play. I think there is some between the lines meaning that I had to research in order to fully understand.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home